All guides
Guides

Congress Trades Filed Mid-July 2026: Senate PTR Wave and Boozman Batch

ProBors shows 41 mid-July congressional filings—Boozman Senate batch, Whitehouse tech lines, Gottheimer sales. Snapshot for disclosure researchers.

Congressional stock trades filed in mid-July 2026 arrived as a Senate-heavy PTR wave after the early-July House batch. As of July 14, 2026, ProBors shows 41 deduplicated disclosure rows with filing dates from July 7 through July 13—spread across nine members, with Sen. John Boozman and Rep. Richard McCormick each contributing ten lines. Filing lag in this window runs from 1 day on a same-week House sale to 39 days on older June Senate lines. This is research context, not investment advice.

Snapshot summary

ProBors sorts congressional disclosures by filing date. In the July 7–13 filing window:

  • 41 rows after deduplication (identical politician, ticker, type, trade date, filing date, amount, and chamber removed)
  • 9 politicians filed in this window
  • Chamber split: 24 House rows, 17 Senate rows
  • Transaction mix: 13 purchases, 28 sales (including partial sales and one call-option sale)
  • Signal tiers: 0 High signal rows, 14 Worth watching, 27 Normal
  • Filing lag: 1-day minimum (Rep. Rick Larsen's July 8 SPGI sale filed July 9), 39-day maximum, 26-day median
  • Notable clusters: Boozman's July 13 Senate batch (10 rows), McCormick's July 8 House batch (10 rows), and Gottheimer's July 7 partial-sale group (7 rows)

The mid-July wave looks different from the early-July House-dominated batch. This window is more Senate-weighted, includes municipal bond lines alongside equities, and spreads across multiple members rather than concentrating on one large periodic PTR dump.

Recent disclosures worth a closer look

The table below shows deduplicated rows from ProBors as of July 14, 2026. Lag is calendar days between transaction date and filing date as reported in each disclosure. Rows without a listed ticker use the security description from the filing.

PoliticianChamberTicker / assetTypeTradedFiledLagAmount rangeSignal
John BoozmanSenateBSXSaleJune 4, 2026July 13, 202639 days$1,001–$15,000Worth watching
John FettermanSenateCheniere Energy Partners note (4.5%, 2029)SaleJune 24, 2026July 9, 202615 days$1,001–$15,000Worth watching
Josh GottheimerHouseADCSaleJune 1, 2026July 7, 202636 days$1,001–$15,000Worth watching
Sheldon WhitehouseSenateMUPurchaseJune 25, 2026July 8, 202613 days$1,001–$15,000Worth watching
Sheldon WhitehouseSenateAAPLSaleJune 24, 2026July 8, 202614 days$15,001–$50,000Worth watching
Tim MooreHouseDASHSaleJune 9, 2026July 8, 202629 days$1,001–$15,000Worth watching
Rick LarsenHouseSPGISaleJuly 8, 2026July 9, 20261 day$1,001–$15,000Normal
Richard McCormickHouseICEPurchaseJune 12, 2026July 8, 202626 days$1,001–$15,000Normal

How to read this without overfitting:

  • Boozman's July 13 batch spans ten Senate lines filed on one date, mixing ETF purchases (IGV, SCHP, PALL) with equity sales (BSX, IEF, ATO). The BSX sale carries the highest signal score in this window and reflects a June 4 trade date filed five weeks later.
  • Whitehouse's July 8 pair shows a tech tilt: a Micron purchase and a larger-bracket Apple sale, both with mid-June trade dates and roughly two-week filing lag.
  • Gottheimer's July 7 group includes partial sales in INSM and full sales in NVZMY and BABA from early-June trade dates—typical periodic House reporting, not same-day activity.
  • Larsen's SPGI sale is the freshest equity line in the snapshot: traded July 8, filed July 9, with only a 1-day lag.
  • Fetterman's bond lines filed July 9 illustrate how municipal and corporate note disclosures appear without equity tickers but still carry Worth watching signal scores.

Filing lag in plain language

STOCK Act disclosures are periodic reports, not live trade feeds. In this mid-July snapshot:

  • Fastest: Larsen's SPGI sale at 1-day lag—traded July 8, filed July 9
  • Typical delay this batch: 26-day median across all 41 rows
  • Slowest: Boozman's BSX and UNH lines tied to June 4 trade dates filed 39 days later on July 13
  • Senate contrast: Whitehouse's July 8 filings carry 13–14-day lag; Boozman's July 13 dump bundles trades from early through late June

When a headline says a senator "just disclosed" a dozen trades, check both dates. A July 13 filing may bundle transactions from the first week of June. For the rules behind that gap, see STOCK Act filing delay explained.

How to research this week's filings on ProBors

  1. Open Congressional trades and sort by filing date descending to mirror this snapshot.
  2. Filter by Senate when you want batches like Boozman's July 13 PTR dump.
  3. Use the politician search to open a member profile and compare trade dates across multiple filings in one sitting.
  4. Sort by signal score when you want to triage Worth watching rows before reading every line.
  5. Cross-check any notable row against the original PTR or Senate eFD PDF before citing it in notes or journalism.

For chamber-specific workflows, see the House stock trading tracker and Senate stock trading tracker guides.

What this does not prove

This mid-July filing wave does not show:

  • That Whitehouse's MU purchase or AAPL sale predict future price moves in those stocks
  • That Boozman's BSX sale reflects non-public information about Boston Scientific
  • Exact dollar amounts—every row uses statutory brackets, not precise trade values
  • Real-time congressional activity; most rows reflect June transactions filed in mid-July
  • That a large periodic PTR batch equals a coordinated trading strategy

Congressional disclosure is a lagging, incomplete window into politician portfolios. Use it for research context and source verification, not as a trading signal.

FAQ

Why is Boozman's July 13 batch so large?

Periodic Senate PTR reports often land many lines at once. Ten rows filed on July 13 with trade dates spanning early to late June is typical batch behavior—not evidence that one senator traded ten times on a single day. Check the trade date column for when each transaction actually occurred.

How does this compare to early July?

The early-July snapshot was House-dominated with 48 Cisneros rows filed July 2. Mid-July flips to a more balanced chamber split spread across nine members, with Boozman and McCormick each filing ten-line batches.

What does "Worth watching" mean on Boozman's BSX row?

ProBors signal scores weigh factors such as transaction type, size bracket, consensus activity, and post-trade price context. Worth watching helps triage—it does not certify intent or future performance. See how ProBors trade signal scores work.

Why do Fetterman's rows lack tickers?

Municipal and corporate bond disclosures often appear without equity tickers in the filing text. ProBors indexes the security description from the PTR. Treat bond lines as fixed-income context, not equity signals.

Is Larsen's 1-day SPGI lag unusual?

Fast filing on a same-week trade is relatively uncommon in this batch but well within STOCK Act rules. It stands out because most mid-July rows carry three- to five-week lag from June trade dates.

Track this week's congressional filings

Sort House and Senate disclosures by filing date, signal score, and ticker on ProBors.

Get started

Sources

Sources & methodology

ProBors dashboard showing disclosure intelligence workflow
ProBors combines public disclosure data, market context, watchlists, and research workflows in one product surface.

Last updated:

ProBors uses public disclosure records, SEC filings, House and Senate financial disclosure portals, market data, and in-product workflow checks. Articles are written as research education, not investment advice.